NEWS

EPA Launches Historic $1 Trillion Deregulatory Push Targeting Climate Rules

EPA Launches Historic $1 Trillion Deregulatory Push Targeting Climate Rules
Photo by Jakub Żerdzicki on Unsplash

EPA Announces Sweeping Regulatory Rollback

The Environmental Protection Agency announced 31 historic deregulatory actions that would eliminate over $1 trillion in regulatory costs and save more than $54 billion annually if finalized, according to EPA press releases. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin described the March 12, 2025 announcement as "the greatest and most consequential day of deregulation in U.S. history," targeting regulations that the agency claims have imposed "hundreds of billions of dollars in hidden taxes on American families every single year" (Epa).

The sweeping initiative represents the most ambitious regulatory rollback in EPA history, dwarfing previous deregulatory efforts. In fiscal 2018, EPA finalized only 10 deregulatory actions resulting in $1.2 billion in cost savings, according to Roll Call analysis. The current proposal would increase that impact by nearly 1,000-fold in terms of estimated savings.

Climate Rules Face Elimination Under New Proposal

The centerpiece of the deregulatory push targets the 2009 Endangerment Finding, which EPA proposed to rescind in a July 29, 2025 announcement in Indianapolis. The finding has been "used to justify over $1 trillion in regulations, including the Biden-Harris Administration's electric vehicle mandate," according to EPA documentation. Administrator Zeldin, joined by U.S. Secretary of Energy Chris Wright, announced that eliminating the finding would "repeal all resulting greenhouse gas emissions regulations for motor vehicles and engines" (Epa).

The 2009 Endangerment Finding has served as the legal foundation for vehicle emissions standards and electric vehicle policies spanning multiple administrations. EPA estimates that more than $1 trillion in regulations have been justified by this single finding, creating what the agency now characterizes as "sixteen years of uncertainty for automakers and American consumers" (Epa).

Automotive Industry Impacts and Consumer Choice

The proposed changes would fundamentally reshape the automotive regulatory landscape by reinstating what EPA calls "consumer choice" in vehicle purchases. The agency argues that current regulations have made it less affordable for Americans to "purchase a car, heat homes, and operate a business," with the new rules designed to reverse these cost impacts (Epa).

Previous regulatory rollback efforts have generated significant estimated savings for automakers. Roll Call reported that a 2018 proposed rule freezing fuel economy standards could save automakers "$120 billion to $340 billion" by maintaining 2020-level requirements through 2026 rather than implementing more stringent standards (Rollcall). The current proposal expands far beyond fuel economy standards to encompass the entire regulatory framework governing vehicle emissions.

Accelerated Deregulatory Timeline

EPA's current deregulatory pace represents a dramatic acceleration from previous years. The agency expects to finalize approximately 30 deregulatory actions in fiscal 2019 while implementing fewer than 10 new regulatory actions, according to Roll Call analysis. This would "roughly triple the EPA's pace from the prior year," when the agency completed 13 total actions (Rollcall).

The ambitious timeline reflects the Trump administration's broader regulatory philosophy. Administrator Zeldin stated the actions would "drive a dagger straight into the heart of the climate change religion to drive down cost of living for American families," emphasizing economic benefits over environmental considerations (Epa).

Environmental Groups Score Limited Victory

Despite the sweeping deregulatory push, environmental advocates achieved one notable success regarding coke oven emissions standards. EPA signaled its intent to kill an interim rule that would have delayed implementation of revised National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants for coke ovens, according to GASP-Pittsburgh analysis. The October 3 notice meant EPA would reinstate compliance deadlines from the 2024 final rule (Gasp-Pgh).

GASP Executive Director Patrick Campbell credited public opposition for the reversal, stating "Our voices - especially when we raise them together - make a difference and can absolutely move the needle, even in this political environment." The organization noted that EPA acknowledged "robust public opposition" as a factor in changing course on the coke oven rule delays (Gasp-Pgh).

Economic Claims and Regulatory Philosophy

EPA projects that eliminating $1 trillion in regulations would end "hidden taxes on American businesses and families" while making it "more affordable to bring manufacturing into local communities." The agency argues that "Biden and Obama era regulations have suffocated nearly every single sector of the American economy," justifying the comprehensive rollback approach (Epa).

The regulatory changes align with the Trump administration's broader economic strategy of reducing compliance costs for industries. Under Office of Management and Budget definitions, actions generating compliance savings for regulated industries qualify as "deregulatory," while those creating compliance costs are considered "regulatory" (Rollcall).

Looking Forward

The proposed changes face a lengthy implementation process, with some actions targeting finalization dates extending into 2025. The scope and scale of the regulatory rollback represent an unprecedented shift in federal environmental policy, potentially reshaping climate and emissions regulations established over more than a decade.

Whether the estimated trillion-dollar savings materialize will depend on successful implementation of the 31 announced actions and their ultimate impact on regulated industries and consumers. The initiative represents the most significant test of the Trump administration's deregulatory approach to environmental policy.

Sources