News

Trump threatens ICE airport deployments despite agency already having billions

By · 2026-05-26
Trump threatens ICE airport deployments despite agency already having billions
Photo by Antek on Unsplash

The shutdown fight over an agency that already has its money

Trump threatened Saturday to deploy ICE agents to US airports by Monday if Democrats refuse to approve DHS funding, but ICE already received tens of billions of dollars from the One Big Beautiful Bill Act earlier this year and will continue operations regardless of whether the current funding bill passes [1][2]. The standoff has entered its fourteenth week, and the only agencies actually at risk are TSA, which has lost 366 agents since the shutdown began on February 14, and FEMA [1][2].

Democrats blocked the DHS funding bill for the fifth time since mid-February, demanding reforms to ICE operations including identification requirements for federal agents, judicial warrants for arrests, body cameras, a uniform code of conduct, independent investigations into violations, a prohibition on masked agents, and coordination mandates with local and state police [1][2]. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer specifically called for a ban on federal agents wearing masks during enforcement operations [2]. The Senate also rejected a Democratic motion to reopen TSA and pay workers who are approaching their second missed paycheck [1].

The threat exposes a constitutional ambiguity about ICE authority at airports. Under USC 1357, ICE can make warrantless arrests within 25 miles of external US boundaries, but legal scholars dispute whether the agency has statutory authority to arrest non-US citizens at airports without judicial warrants [1]. Airport security currently falls under TSA jurisdiction, while ICE handles immigration enforcement; both agencies sit within DHS, but their operational boundaries have remained distinct [1]. Trump's statement about deploying ICE to conduct arrests of "all undocumented immigrants" at airports, coupled with unsubstantiated claims about Somali immigrants "destroying" Minnesota, signals an intention to collapse that jurisdictional separation [1].

Senate Majority Leader John Thune signaled openness to negotiating ICE reforms with Democrats, noting that the Republican-approved DHS bill already includes funding for body cameras and de-escalation training for agents and provides less money for ICE than the Trump administration requested [2]. But the gap between what Republicans have offered and what Democrats are demanding remains wide enough that Senator Patty Murray emphasized Democrats had "no objections" to five other pending spending bills that would authorize funds through September, only the DHS bill [2].

The practical effect of continued blockage falls entirely on agencies other than the one being debated. TSA has hemorrhaged 366 agents since the shutdown began, with thousands more facing a second full paycheck loss the following week [1]. FEMA remains unfunded [2]. ICE operations continue uninterrupted, funded by the earlier appropriation that neither party can now claw back through this spending fight [2]. The shutdown functions as a negotiating tactic over accountability measures for an agency whose funding is not actually in dispute.

Tricia McLaughlin, DHS's top spokesperson, left her position amid what sources described as "growing outrage" over Trump's ICE raids [3]. McLaughlin had originally planned to depart in December but remained following the shooting deaths of agents Pretti and Good [3]. In a statement after Good's killing, she wrote that "dangerous criminals, whether they be illegal aliens or US citizens, are assaulting law enforcement" [3]. Lauren Bis was promoted to replace McLaughlin as assistant secretary for public affairs [3]. The departure signals internal recognition that the current enforcement posture carries political costs even within the administration.

The standoff has now lasted longer than the operational disruption it was designed to prevent. TSA workers operate without pay while politicians argue over reforms to an agency whose budget is secure. The question is no longer whether ICE will be funded, it already is, but whether Democrats can extract accountability concessions by holding other DHS agencies hostage, and whether Republicans will accept those concessions or let airport security and emergency management degrade further. Neither side has blinked through five votes. The 366 TSA agents who quit made a different calculation.

The sixth vote is scheduled for Tuesday, with no indication that the arithmetic has changed.